You Need To Write An Introduction And Conclusion For The Methods And Results 2825491

Participants
A total of 540 undergraduate students (141 Males and 399 Females) from Western Sydney University were recruited via convenience sampling and participated in a study investigating the effects of self-affirmation on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. The participants age ranged from 17 to 71 years, and a mean age of 21.30 years (SD = 5.84). Participation was completed voluntarily as part of an assessment task.
Materials and Apparatus
Hedonic Well-being. The Modified Differential Emotions Scale (Fredrickson, Tugade, Waugh, & Larkin, 2003) is a 20-item scale that asked participants to rate the degree to which they felt a variety of positive emotions (e.g., “I have felt interested, alert, curious”) and negative emotions (e.g., “I have felt scared, fearful, afraid”). Participants were asked to rate each item on a five-point Likert scale (1 = Never, 5 = Most of the time). A higher score indicated more hedonic well-being.
Eudaimonic Well-being. Participants completed an 18-item scale that measured meaning, relatedness, autonomy, flow, and competence. Sample items included “In the last seven days, I felt my choices were based on my true interests and values” and “In the last seven days, I felt close and connected with other people who are important to me”. Participants were asked to rate each item on a seven-point Likert scale (1 = Not at all, 7 = Very much). A higher score indicated higher levels of eudaimonic well-being.
The surveys were completed on the participant’s own personal electronic device using the Qualtrics Survey Platform. These personal electronic devices included, but were not limited to: computers, tablets, and mobile phones. Additionally, in the event that a participant did not have access to an electronic device then a pen and a printed paper version of the survey was provided.
Document Preview:

Method Participants A total of 540 undergraduate students (141 Males and 399 Females) from Western Sydney University were recruited via convenience sampling and participated in a study investigating the effects of self-affirmation on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. The participants age ranged from 17 to 71 years, and a mean age of 21.30 years (SD = 5.84). Participation was completed voluntarily as part of an assessment task. Materials and Apparatus Hedonic Well-being. The Modified Differential Emotions Scale (Fredrickson, Tugade, Waugh, & Larkin, 2003) is a 20-item scale that asked participants to rate the degree to which they felt a variety of positive emotions (e.g., “I have felt interested, alert, curious”) and negative emotions (e.g., “I have felt scared, fearful, afraid”). Participants were asked to rate each item on a five-point Likert scale (1 = Never, 5 = Most of the time). A higher score indicated more hedonic well-being. Eudaimonic Well-being. Participants completed an 18-item scale that measured meaning, relatedness, autonomy, flow, and competence. Sample items included “In the last seven days, I felt my choices were based on my true interests and values” and “In the last seven days, I felt close and connected with other people who are important to me”. Participants were asked to rate each item on a seven-point Likert scale (1 = Not at all, 7 = Very much). A higher score indicated higher levels of eudaimonic well-being. The surveys were completed on the participant’s own personal electronic device using the Qualtrics Survey Platform. These personal electronic devices included, but were not limited to: computers, tablets, and mobile phones. Additionally, in the event that a participant did not have access to an electronic device then a pen and a printed paper version of the survey was provided. Procedure Before testing began, participants were given an experiment information sheet and consent form to read then electronically signed via ticking a…

Attachments:

180822—1011….docx

Prof. Angela

4.6/5

Calculate Price


Price (USD)
$
Open chat