Oer Hrmd 610 Week 3 Assignment 2766995

OER HRMD 610
Week 3
Assignment
Note: Submissions will not be accepted after grades for this assignment have been posted. Alternate assignments are not available.
Instructions
This assignment is worth 100 points and 20% of your total grade. It requires you to draw upon what you have learned in the first 3 weeks of class to analyze a fictitious case study involving possible employee discrimination.
Please read the following case study. Then, answer the following questions:

  1. Explain what is legally needed in order for religious discrimination to exist.
  2. Is the company guilty of religious discrimination? Match the facts of the case to the legal criteria.
  3. Explain what is legally needed in order for racial harassment to exist.
  4. Is the company guilty of racial harassment? Match the facts of the case to the legal criteria.
  5. Evaluate the actions of the HR director, Marta Ford, in response to Maalick’s situation. What did she do well? What did she need to do better?

Be sure to incorporate appropriate scholarly and practitioner references to support your key ideas. The total length of your assignment should be no more than 5-6 pages, not including the cover page and reference list.
******************************************************************************************
Document Preview:

OER HRMD 610 Week 3 Assignment Note: Submissions will not be accepted after grades for this assignment have been posted.  Alternate assignments are not available. Instructions This assignment is worth 100 points and 20% of your total grade. It requires you to draw upon what you have learned in the first 3 weeks of class to analyze a fictitious case study involving possible employee discrimination.Please read the following case study. Then, answer the following questions: Explain what is legally needed in order for religious discrimination to exist. Is the company guilty of religious discrimination? Match the facts of the case to the legal criteria. Explain what is legally needed in order for racial harassment to exist. Is the company guilty of racial harassment? Match the facts of the case to the legal criteria. Evaluate the actions of the HR director, Marta Ford, in response to Maalick’s situation. What did she do well? What did she need to do better? Be sure to incorporate appropriate scholarly and practitioner references to support your key ideas. The total length of your assignment should be no more than 5-6 pages, not including the cover page and reference list. ****************************************************************************************** (Note: The people and facts in this case are fictitious and do not represent any known party, organization, religion or situation.) Treton Communications, Inc. EEO/Anti-Discrimination/Diversity/Harassment Policy Revised 2007 EEO/Anti-Discrimination Treton Communications, Inc. is an Equal Employment Opportunity employer. Policies of the company prohibit discrimination against an applicant or employee on the basis of race, color, religion, sex/gender (including pregnancy), national origin, age, disability, marital status or veteran status. The company will conform to the spirit as well as the letter of all applicable laws and regulations. The policy of equal employment opportunity and…

Attachments:

OER-HRMD-610-….docx

Prof. Angela

4.6/5

Calculate Price


Price (USD)
$