MATH 225 Chamberlain University Week 5 Height of People Survey Sheet

Question Description

  • MATH225N-61306
  • Modules
  • Week 5 Assignment: Lab

March 2020

Week 5 Assignment: Lab

  • Due
    Apr 5 by
    11:59pm
  • Points
    50
  • Submitting
    a file upload

Required Resources

Read/review the following resources for this activity:

  • OpenStax Textbook: Chapter 2, 6, and 7
  • Lesson
  • Weeks 3 and 5 Excel Spreadsheets

Scenario/Summary

This week’s lab highlights the use of probability and normal distribution.

Follow the directions below to gather data, calculate using Excel spreadsheets, and interpret the results.

Deliverables

The deliverable is a Word document with your answers to the questions posed below based on the data you find.

Required Software

  • Microsoft Word
  • Microsoft Excel

Steps to Complete Week 5 Lab

Use the Weeks 3 and 5 spreadsheets to help you answer the questions below.

Step 1: Survey or measure 10 people to find their heights. Determine
the mean and standard deviation for this group by using the Week 3 Excel
spreadsheet. Post a screen shot of the portion of the spreadsheet that
helped you determine these values. How does your height compare to the
mean (average) height of the group that you surveyed? Is your height
taller, shorter, or the same as the mean of your group?

Data Example of 10 people with different heights

Step 2: Give some background information on the group of people you
used in your study. You might consider using the following questions to
guide your answer.

  1. How did you choose the participants for your study (sampling method)?
  2. What part of the country did your study take place in?
  3. What are the age ranges of your participants?
  4. How many of each gender did you have in your study?
  5. What are other interesting factors about your group?

Step 3: Use the Week 5 Excel spreadsheet for the following.

  1. (Use the Empirical Rule tab from the spreadsheet).
    Determine the 68%, 95%, and 99.7% values of the Empirical Rule in terms
    of the ten heights in your height study.
  2. What do these values tell you?
  3. Post a screen shot of your work from the Week 5 Excel spreadsheet.
    Week 5 Spreadsheet Example
  4. (Use the normal probability tab from the spreadsheet). Based on your
    study results, what percent of the study participants are shorter than
    you? What percent are taller than you?
  5. Post a screen shot of your work from the Week 5 Excel spreadsheet.

    Example: If my height is 73 inches, then 20.86% of the relevant population is shorter. The other 79.14%, of course, is taller.

Week 5 Spreadsheet Example

Step 4: Be sure your name is on the Word document, save it, and then submit it under “Assignments” and “Week 5: Lab”.

Grading

This activity will be graded based on the Week 5 Lab Rubric.

Course Outcomes (CO): 3, 4, 5

Due Date: By 11:59 p.m. MT on Sunday

Rubric

Week 5 Assignment: Lab

Week 5 Assignment: Lab

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Measures of Central Tendency and Variation

12.0
pts
Addresses
all elements of the following: *10 height values *mean of data
*standard deviation of data *screenshot of values calculated on
spreadsheet *comparison of heights

10.2
pts
Addresses
4 out of 5 of the following: *10 height values *mean of data *standard
deviation of data *screenshot of values calculated on spreadsheet
*comparison of heights

8.4
pts
Addresses
3 out of 5 of the following: *10 height values *mean of data
*standard deviation of data *screenshot of values calculated on
spreadsheet *comparison of heights

6.6
pts
Addresses
1 or 2 out of 5 of the following: *10 height values *mean of data
*standard deviation of data *screenshot of values calculated on
spreadsheet *comparison of heights

0.0
pts
No Effort

12.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Population Data and Sampling Techniques

15.0
pts
Addresses
all elements of the following: *Sampling method *Location *Age group of
participants *Gender of participants *Other factors about participants

12.75
pts
Addresses
4 out of 5 of the following: *Sampling method *Location *Age group of
participants *Gender of participants *Other factors about participants

10.5
pts
Addresses
3 out of 5 of the following: *Sampling method *Location *Age group of
participants *Gender of participants *Other factors about participants

8.25
pts
Addresses
1 or 2 out of 5 of the following: *Sampling method *Location *Age
group of participants *Gender of participants *Other factors about
participants

0.0
pts
No Effort

15.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Probability, and Measures that would follow a normal distribution in life sciences

15.0
pts
Addresses
all elements of the following: *Empirical Rule values *Interpretation
of Empirical Rule values *Screenshot of Empirical spreadsheet
*Interpretation of Normal Distribution spreadsheet values *Screenshot of
probabilities/ percentiles

12.75
pts
Addresses
4 out of 5 of the following: *Empirical Rule values *Interpretation of
Empirical Rule values *Screenshot of Empirical spreadsheet
*Interpretation of Normal Distribution spreadsheet values *Screenshot of
probabilities/ percentiles

10.5
pts
Addresses
3 out of 5 of the following: *Empirical Rule values *Interpretation of
Empirical Rule values *Screenshot of Empirical spreadsheet
*Interpretation of Normal Distribution spreadsheet values *Screenshot of
probabilities/ percentiles

8.25
pts
Addresses
1 or 2 out of 5 of the following: *Empirical Rule values
*Interpretation of Empirical Rule values *Screenshot of Empirical
spreadsheet *Interpretation of Normal Distribution spreadsheet values
*Screenshot of probabilities/ percentiles

0.0
pts
No Effort

15.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Grammar and Formatting

8.0
pts
Lab is easy to read and presents material in a logical order with no grammatical errors.

6.8
pts
Lab is
easy to read and presents material in a logical order. There are a few
grammatical errors but they do not distract from readability.

5.6
pts
Lab is easy to read and has few grammatical errors, but it is not logically organized.

4.4
pts
There are significant grammatical errors and organizational issues that distract from readability.

0.0
pts
No Effort

8.0 pts

Total Points:
50.0

Prof. Angela

4.6/5

Calculate Price


Price (USD)
$
Need Help? Reach us here via Whatsapp.